| 🌤️ Partly sunny, with a high near 45. |
It's Thursday, T-minus one week until Thanksgiving. Beacon Hill lawmakers wrapped up work and took off for the holidays yesterday. But the 2026 ballot question campaign cycle is just getting cooking. Let's start today with a debate you could be hearing a lot about next year: The ballot battle ahead: Just over two decades after Massachusetts voters banned rent control across the state, a new ballot question fight on the issue is taking shape. This week, supporters of a ballot initiative to enact rent stabilization across the entire state announced they had gathered over 124,000 signatures — nearly 50,000 more than what they needed to meet a crucial deadline yesterday. Local and state election officials still need to certify the signatures before the question can move forward in the multi-step process to get on next November's ballot. But the initiative has already prompted the local real estate industry to mobilize for what could be a bruising fight (and put some typical allies in an awkward spot). - How would it work? Let's start with the basics. If successful, the question would immediately cap annual rent increases in all cities and towns in Massachusetts at the rate of inflation, up to a maximum of 5%. So, for an apartment that costs $2,000 per month, the maximum possible rent hike allowed would be $100 per month. (That said, based on recent inflation rates, the cap would be less than 5% in most years.) The limit would also apply when apartments turnover, so landlords wouldn't be able to make drastic rent hikes between tenants.
- Are there exceptions? Yes. Supporters of the ballot question acknowledge the need to build more homes to get out of the housing shortage that has driven up prices in Massachusetts. So the limit would not apply to new buildings for the first 10 years. It also wouldn't apply to owner-occupied buildings with four or fewer units (for example, three-deckers where the landlord lives on one floor). There are also carveouts for public housing, nonprofits and short-term rentals.
- Who's for it? Keep Massachusetts Home, the group backing the ballot question, is a coalition of tenant advocates, unions and progressive groups — anchored by Homes for All Massachusetts. The group had been advocating for rent control legislation on Beacon Hill — to no avail . So they decided to take the issue directly to voters. "Our communities can't wait," Carolyn Chou, the executive director of Homes for All, told WBUR's Stevee Chapman. "We have seen this crisis continue to intensify — corporate landlords coming in, in every corner of the state, and buying properties and doubling the rents on tenants."
- Who's against it? Local real estate leaders are spearheading the early opposition to the question. They argue it would be "the most restrictive rent control program" in the country and exacerbate the housing shortage by discouraging new construction. They also stress that the proposed statewide law is a far cry from the status quo before the 1994 ban, when only Boston, Brookline and Cambridge had rent control (since then, only a handful of cities have asked Beacon Hill to let them bring it back). "It will unquestionably make our housing crisis worse and significantly reduce the supply of quality homes on the rental market," the Greater Boston Real Estate Board and the statewide associations of realtors and commercial real estate developers said in a statement this week. The group added that it will work to oppose the question "at every point of the process."
- Somewhere in the middle: Boston Mayor Michelle Wu. Perhaps the state's highest-profile rent control supporter, Wu has yet to take a position on the initiative — and even voiced some concerns. In a GBH interview this week, Wu described the 5% cap as "quite restrictive," compared to the 10% limit she has pushed for in Boston. "I wish that the ballot initiative had been just a pure local option — repeal the ban on cities taking action and let each city do what they need to do — because the conditions can be quite different in each municipality," Wu said. "We do need to be at the right balance between not chilling or preventing housing production, while we are keeping people in their homes."
- Go deeper: CommonWealth Beacon has more here on how both the policy and politics the question is dividing progressives.
P.S.— The rent control question isn't the only one moving forward. Supporters of at least a half-dozen other ballot questions — ranging from lawmaker stipends to the state sales tax to starter homes — say they collected more than the required 74,574 signatures. WBUR's Chris Van Buskirk has more on the next steps here. |
|
| | | Nik DeCosta-Klipa Senior Editor, Newsletters | | |
|
Massachusetts officials says batteries will bring down energy costs and help the grid run on more renewables. But there's a growing movement of people who say they don't want this technology in their city or town. Read more. |
|
Larry Summers has seen his share of controversy, and up to now, he's bounced back. But the scandal engulfing those with ties to Jeffrey Epstein is, for now, derailing the high-profile economist at the university where he was once a hard-charging president. On Wednesday night, Summers announced he was taking a leave from Harvard while the school investigates his ties to Epstein. Read more. |
|
The Labor Department will report on hiring and unemployment. The report, which was delayed by a government shutdown, is somewhat stale but could offer clues about the strength or weakness of the job market. Read more. |
|
The latest emails from Jeffrey Epstein's estate show communications with a vast web of influential figures in politics, academia, business and more, even after he registered as a sex offender. Read more. |
|
The former District 3 councilor, who had hoped to snag one of four at-large seats in November, instead ended up more than 15,000 votes behind Henry Santana. Read more. |
|
- Next month marks the 60th anniversary of the start of the Freedom Flights, a twice-a-day government-run plane route transporting Cubans to Miami that largest refugee airlift in American history. Local writer Ana Hebra Flaster, who came to the U.S. on one of the flights, writes in this Cognoscenti commentary that not all Cuban immigrants have been so lucky.
- The 2025 National Book Award winners were announced last night, with author Rabih Alameddine's "The True True Story of Raja the Gullible (and His Mother)" taking home the prize for best fiction. Read the full list of winners and finalists here.
- Movies don’t get much smaller than “Peter Hujar’s Day," writes film critic Sean Burns. The film, which follows the minute details of an average day of an influential New York photographer, is just 76 minutes long. But by the end, Burns writes, "you feel like you’ve witnessed something dazzling."
- The South Asian-American Theater Festival kicks off for its fourth year this weekend in Watertown. Here's a preview.
|
- We created a searchable database with all 20,000 files from Epstein’s Estate (COURIER)
- A week inside the opaque court where CT immigrants learn their fate (CT Insider)
- The DEA cast him as a cartel member. He calls himself the poster child of America’s drug crisis. (The Boston Globe)
|
The FDA recently approved a pretzel-shaped implant that helps some bladder cancer patients keep their bladder. Dr. Chris Cutie, a former urologist at Mass General Brigham who helped develop the treatment, says it's the first real advance for patients with the most common form of bladder cancer in over 50 years. Read more. |
|
Play: WBUR's daily mini crossword. Can you keep your streak going?
Before you go: Bald is beautiful. |
😎 Forward to a friend. They can sign up here.
🔎 Explore WBUR's Field Guide stories, events and more.
📣 Give us your feedback: newsletters@wbur.org
📧 Get more WBUR stories sent to your inbox. Check out all of our newsletter offerings. |
|
|
|
Comments
Post a Comment