ICYMI: BREAKING: Canada’s Quiet Treasury Sell‑Off: Why It Matters for Trump’s Economy—and the Dollar
BREAKING: Canada’s Quiet Treasury Sell‑Off: Why It Matters for Trump’s Economy—and the DollarCanadian investors have been selling of US treasury Bonds in DROVES this month and Washington is starting to shit their collective pants.Canadian investors, with little or no confidence in the Trump economy, have been trimming their U.S. Treasury exposure in fits and starts this year. No drama, no headlines. Just a steady click of the “sell” button that makes Washington’s math a little harder. The quiet part out loudEvery month, routine data logs what cross‑border investors buy and sell. Buried in those spreadsheets: several months where Canadian investors (public and private) sold U.S. government bonds and, at times, Treasury bills. Some months they bought; some months they sold. But the pattern that stands out is a rotation out of longer‑term bonds and, in a few cases, into short‑term bills. Two clarifications up front:
Why that’s a problem for “Trump’s economy”1) It nudges long‑term interest rates higherWhen a big, reliable buyer steps back, the U.S. Treasury has to offer a bit more yield to clear auctions. Add that up across many auctions and many countries, and you’ve got tighter financial conditions without a single Fed meeting.
2) It fattens the federal interest tabAmerica’s interest bill is already near historic highs. 37 trillion dollar deficit. Higher yields—whether from heavy issuance or less foreign demand—compound that bill. Dollars that could fund infrastructure, defense, or tax relief get diverted to interest payments. That’s fiscal drag in slow motion and Canadian investors aren’t dumb. 3) It makes markets more sensitive to surprisesWhen the foreign “safety net” thins, Treasury auctions become more twitchy. A weak sale here, a sloppy bid there, and suddenly you’ve got term‑premium jitters rippling through mortgages, corporate bonds, and stocks. Even if the economy is otherwise healthy, the cost of money does more of the tightening. What’s actually going on in Canada?Think of Canada’s shift as portfolio housekeeping with consequences. Large institutions continually juggle risk:
If others join, what happens to the dollar?Let’s split this into near‑term mechanics and long‑run structure. If foreign investors sell longer‑dated Treasuries, yields rise, and real carry improves. Money that chases yield might buy dollars, at least for a while. Paradoxically, a softer foreign bid for bonds can strengthen the currency in the short run. If more reserve managers slowly diversify—adding a little more gold here, a little more non‑USD there—the dollar’s structural advantage shrinks at the margin. No cliff, no crash; think glacial change, not a waterfall. But glacial change over years still raises the U.S. cost of borrowing, which feeds back into growth, housing, and valuations. If several large holders all cut duration at once, term premia spike, auctions tail, and volatility jumps. Safe‑haven flows might initially support the dollar, but if the Fed has to step in to stabilize the market (or Trump has to go for investors to have any confidence in the US Bond market), the long‑run mix (higher debt, more intervention) can turn the dollar’s slow erosion into something more noticeable - like a deep recession or depression. What to watch (so you’re early, not late)
Nerd corner (for the policy and markets crowd)
What’s not happening
The bottom lineCanada’s trim is a small but telling example of how today’s bond market works: the U.S. is issuing a lot because it’s broke. There’s a conman/felon in the White House who has the economic understanding of a Lama. The world is more price‑sensitive, and even friendly neighbors are managing risk by shortening up. For the Trump White House, that means higher long‑term rates at the margin, a fatter interest bill, and a bumpier road for housing and markets. AKA, An Economic DISASTER. If a few more big holders make similar moves, it won’t break the dollar—but it will keep turning the screws on America’s cost of money. |


Comments
Post a Comment