Taking stock of Massachusetts health care reform at 20

 


ADVERTISEMENT

LND Ad (1)

The Download Email Header

SOLAR SHOWDOWN: The Supreme Judicial Court heard arguments in a case over the denial of a permit for a large solar power project by the rural Central Massachusetts town of Petersham. The solar company claims it’s covered by a state law that generally bars communities from blocking solar projects. Peterhsam says its goal is to stop the clear-cutting of trees from most of the 14-acre parcel in question. Jordan Wolman unpacks the story.   

On April 12, 2006, then-Gov. Mitt Romney, surrounded by a sea of Democratic officeholders in historic Faneuil Hall, signed historic legislation that put Massachusetts on course to be the first state in the country to ensure health care coverage for nearly all residents.  

Twenty years later, 97 percent of Massachusetts residents have health insurance thanks to “An Act Providing Affordable, Quality, Accountable Health Care,” the landmark result of bipartisan cooperation between the state’s Republican governor and Democratic lawmakers. Also instrumental was bipartisan backing from Washington — something hard to imagine today — where a Republican administration and the state’s senior senator, Ted Kennedy, took a keen interest in the law’s passage.    

The Massachusetts reform, often referred to by the shorthand “Chapter 58,” for its designation among that year’s laws, served as the model for the Affordable Care Act signed by President Barack Obama four years later. It has cemented the state’s status as the national leader in efforts to make good on the idea that access to health coverage in a wealthy country should be a right, not a privilege.  

Two decades later, there is plenty to say about how it came to be, what its impact has been, and what the challenges are today for Massachusetts health care. Today, we are publishing six essays capturing a wide range of opinions on the law.   

The one point of agreement among all of them is captured by John McDonough, a pivotal player in Massachusetts law and the ACA that followed: “Like it or hate it, Chapter 58 mattered,” he writes in his essay.  

McDonough tells the tale as well as anyone could, explaining the crucial funding issues that helped get everyone to yes on the reform law. “In the end, it was about money and morality, too,” he says of the converging factors that “opened a window of opportunity for a historic advance.”  

A centerpiece of the law was the creation of the Massachusetts Health Connector, the “exchange” marketplace where residents without employer-based insurance or coverage through Medicare or Medicaid could enroll in plans, with significant subsidies available based on income. 

ADVERTISEMENT

National Grid 640x200

“There had never been an organization in Massachusetts, or the nation, quite like the Health Connector, with its complex set of operational and policy responsibilities,” writes Audrey Morse Gasteier, executive director of the Connector.  

The Health Connector, she says, had to be both resilient and flexible. “This is an organization that was designed to be on the move and to innovate,” she writes. “The contours of our 20-year history prove that our architects were right to think the Health Connector would need to flex and move and bend; our history shows how we’ve evolved and adapted the way our programs and policies work to meet the needs of the people we’re here to serve.” 

Jeffrey Sánchez, who grew up in public housing in Boston’s Mission Hill neighborhood and went on to serve top leadership roles in the Massachusetts House, zeroes in on the law’s significance for those who are often on the outside looking in. “It was the moment the Legislature decided that access to health coverage could not be left to chance,” he writes.  

Tiffany Joseph, an associate professor of sociology and international affairs at Northeastern University, points to an aspect of the 2006 law that stood out at the time and is even more noteworthy today: It extended coverage options to documented immigrants with various noncitizen statuses. 

ADVERTISEMENT

640x200_UMMH

Joseph says immigrants nonetheless face a range of obstacles to care. The reason, she writes, “lies at the intersection of race, ethnicity, and legal status — what scholars call ‘racialized legal status.’ Despite Massachusetts’s inclusive policies, structural racism and legal status discrimination have consistently undermined immigrants’ access to care, creating barriers that persist even for those who have coverage.” 

While there may be plenty to celebrate about the 2006 law’s nation-leading expansion of health care coverage, Chapter 58 and Massachusetts health care developments that have followed it draw sharp criticism from voices representing the state’s business community and an independent primary care practitioner.  

Eileen McAnneny and Rick Lord, top officials at Associated Industries of Massachusetts in 2006, say business community support for the law was premised on a vow that the state would then turn to legislation addressing health care costs. Those efforts, they write, have been woefully inadequate.  

“Despite its promising vision, the law’s implementation and the cost-containment legislation that was subsequently adopted have fallen far short of their goals, leading to a more expensive and challenging system to navigate now. Massachusetts has among the highest health care costs in the country, with annual increases consistently outpacing inflation and wage growth,” write McAnneny and Lord.  

Jeffrey Gold, a primary care physician in Salem, and Jon Hurst, president of the Retailers Association of Massachusetts, say the law has enabled inflationary health care consolidation, squeezing out independent primary care practitioners, and has been particularly burdensome to small businesses, whose premium costs have soared.  

“As Chapter 58 expanded government coverage and mandated subsidized insurance, it created a system that continues to saddle taxpayers and working families with escalating premiums, hospital bills, record-breaking drug prices, and unnecessary hospital expansions,” they write. “High-cost Boston academic medical hospitals have acquired smaller hospitals, primary care practices, and even insurers, creating multi-billion-dollar companies that drive up our premiums and erase competition.” 

LEGISLATIVE AUDIT: Following months of an increasingly bitter feud with Diana DiZoglio, Attorney General Andrea Campbell used a live radio interview to signal a new willingness to find a path forward on the long-stalled legislative audit. What looked like an olive branch, however, was met with a blistering reply from DiZoglio, who accused the state’s top law enforcement officer of violating professional ethics standards by simply calling her cell phone. Chris Lisinski has more.  

OPINION: Today’s MBTA doesn’t work for residents across Greater Boston, write Charles Lyu, Will Palmer, and Robert Warren, co-leads of the TransitMatters FRAME the Future campaign. We need a long-term vision and plan for a transit system that enables all of us to fulfill our essential needs. The MBTA has launched Focus 2050 to develop its latest long-term planning document. This process will establish priorities over a 25-year timeframe and is scheduled for publication in mid-2027, with community engagement starting this spring. 

CODCAST: The Healey administration is steering into artificial intelligence, and there’s more at stake than just jobs or economic growth — all sorts of personal data are involved, with some contractual protections in place. Reporter Jennifer Smith hosts Jason Snyder, the state’s technology secretary, for a discussion about the AI embrace on the latest episode of The Codcast

ROLLINS RUNNING: Rachael Rollins, the scandal-plagued former Suffolk DA and Massachusetts US attorney who resigned her federal post in disgrace, appears poised to make a run for the DA’s seat she once held, taking out nomination papers from the secretary of state’s office on Wednesday afternoon. (Boston Herald – paywall) 

NEVER MIND THE BOSTON HERALD PROPAGANDA RAG!

FREE ARTICLE IN WBUR TODAY! 

LAWRENCE WIRETAP?: Attorney General Andrea Campbell’s office is investigating allegations that Mayor Brian DePeña has been secretly recording conversations in Lawrence City Hall. (WBUR)  

TOP COP STOPThe former Adams police chief has been indicted on three felony fraud charges. (The Berkshire Eagle – paywall) 

Ex-Adams police chief Scott Kelly indicted in fraud scheme

Story by Josh Lanier
 •

Former Adams Chief of Police K. Scott Kelly

A former Massachusetts police chief is now facing criminal charges after investigators say he illegally collected nearly $20,000 in fraudulent overtime.

K. Scott Kelly, 46, of Mauldin, South Carolina, the former chief of the Adams Police Department, was indicted by a grand jury on charges related to the alleged scheme, the Berkshire County District Attorney's Office said.

The charges include procurement fraud, making a false claim to an employer, and larceny over $1,200 by a single scheme. Each charge carries a potential sentence of up to five years in state prison or 2.5 years in a house of correction, the prosecutor said.

The indictment alleges that from January 2024 through at least January 2025, Kelly submitted fraudulent reimbursement claims under a municipal traffic enforcement grant administered by the Office of Grants and Research in conjunction with the Massachusetts Department of Transportation, authorities said.

Investigators say Kelly submitted claims for overtime pay he did not earn. In total, officials allege he received $19,123.15 for time when he was either not working or performing duties outside the grant’s requirements.

The indictment adds new context to questions surrounding Kelly’s departure as police chief.

In September, the Adams Board of Selectmen placed Kelly on paid leave. Town officials did not explain the reason for the decision.

The board appointed Timothy Sorrell as the Adams acting chief of police. He remains in that role.

Kelly served as chief of police beginning in January 2021.

MSN


 

STADIUM ARUGMENTS: Supreme Judicial Court justices peppered both sides with sharp questions in the case challenging Boston’s right to build a new professional women’s soccer stadium in Franklin Park. (The Boston Globe – paywall)   


State’s highest court weighs challenge to White Stadium renovation

PTOWN SHOUTOUT: Its vibe is something different than the Norman Rockwell-type setting that comes to mind when you think about small-town America, but Provincetown has been named one of the top 10 small towns in the Northeast by USA Today. (Cape Cod Times – paywall)   

 
 
 
https://commonwealthbeacon.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/cropped-30-Year-CWB-New.png

Published by MassINC

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

CONGRESSMAN JAKE AUCHINCLOSS

Ramble On: Waiting for the Barbarians (video)

RSN: 'Hat in Hand': Putin Meets Xi at Summit in Samarkand